UltraBullet • 0+0
Rated, 2022-06-27
Daily UltraBulletCreated by: Chess.pro
160 - 159
After the game, you can run an analysis of your game and analyze the advantage graph.
FEN
PGN
[Event "Daily UltraBullet Arena"] [Site "https://chess.pro/84xXZeue"] [Date "2022.06.27"] [White "agonizing-servant"] [Black "ignorant-letter"] [Result "0-1"] [UTCDate "2022.06.27"] [UTCTime "21:10:43"] [WhiteElo "1738"] [BlackElo "1551"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-9"] [BlackRatingDiff "+29"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "15+0"] [ECO "C25"] [Opening "Vienna Game: Anderssen Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "chess.pro"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Bc5 { C25 Vienna Game: Anderssen Defense } 3. Qf3?! { (0.36 → -0.43) Inaccuracy. Nf3 was best. } (3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nxd4 Nf6 6. Bf4 Nc6 7. Nxc6 bxc6 8. Qd2 O-O 9. O-O-O Qe7) 3... d6 4. b4?? { (0.01 → -2.09) Blunder. Na4 was best. } (4. Na4) 4... Bxb4 5. Bc4 Nf6 6. Nd5 Nxd5 7. Bxd5 O-O 8. Qg3? { (-1.97 → -3.37) Mistake. c3 was best. } (8. c3 Ba5) 8... c6?! { (-3.37 → -2.40) Inaccuracy. Nd7 was best. } (8... Nd7) 9. Bc4 b5 10. Be2 Na6 11. c3 Ba5 12. Ba3 Bb6? { (-3.53 → -2.12) Mistake. Rb8 was best. } (12... Rb8 13. Rc1) 13. d4?? { (-2.12 → -4.98) Blunder. Nf3 was best. } (13. Nf3 f5 14. exf5 Bxf5 15. O-O Nc5 16. Bxc5 Bxc5 17. d4 exd4 18. Nxd4 Bd7 19. Bh5 b4) 13... f5?! { (-4.98 → -3.74) Inaccuracy. exd4 was best. } (13... exd4 14. Bxd6) 14. Qd3?! { (-3.74 → -5.77) Inaccuracy. exf5 was best. } (14. exf5 exd4 15. cxd4 Bxd4 16. Rd1 c5 17. Bc1 Bxf5 18. Nf3 Bc3+ 19. Bd2 Bxd2+ 20. Rxd2 c4) 14... fxe4 15. Qxe4 Bb7?? { (-5.82 → -2.74) Blunder. b4 was best. } (15... b4 16. Qxc6 Rb8 17. cxb4 Bxd4 18. Nf3 Bxa1 19. O-O Nxb4 20. Bxb4 Rxb4 21. Rxa1 Be6 22. Bd3) 16. Nf3 Rf4 17. Qb1 e4 18. Qb3+? { (-2.55 → -4.15) Mistake. Nd2 was best. } (18. Nd2) 18... Rf7 19. Nd2 Qe7? { (-3.23 → -1.73) Mistake. d5 was best. } (19... d5 20. O-O) 20. O-O Nc7? { (-2.05 → -0.91) Mistake. b4 was best. } (20... b4 21. cxb4 Nc7 22. Nc4 Ne6 23. Bb2 Nf4 24. Bg4 Ba6 25. g3 h5 26. Bc1 d5 27. Nxb6) 21. Bh5?? { (-0.91 → -2.71) Blunder. Rae1 was best. } (21. Rae1 c5) 21... g6 22. Rae1 c5?? { (-3.83 → -1.09) Blunder. b4 was best. } (22... b4 23. Rxe4 Qf6 24. Rg4 bxa3 25. Ne4 Qe6 26. Qxe6 Nxe6 27. Bxg6 hxg6 28. Rxg6+ Rg7 29. Rxe6) 23. dxc5 dxc5 24. Qd1?? { (-0.82 → -6.62) Blunder. Bf3 was best. } (24. Bf3 c4) 24... Rd8 25. Bf3 Rxf3 26. Qb3+?! { (-5.98 → -9.06) Inaccuracy. Qxf3 was best. } (26. Qxf3) 26... Rf7 27. Re2 a5 28. Bc1 a4 29. Qb2 Qh4 30. g3 Qg4 31. Rfe1 c4 32. Nxc4?! { (-11.50 → Mate in 10) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Re3 was best. } (32. Re3 Bxe3) 32... e3 33. Nxb6 Qe4 34. f3 Qxf3 35. Rg2 Rd2 36. Qxd2 exd2 37. Re8+ Nxe8 38. g4 d1=R# { Black wins by checkmate. } 0-1
After the game, you can run an analysis of your game and analyze the advantage graph.
FEN
PGN
[Event "Daily UltraBullet Arena"] [Site "https://chess.pro/84xXZeue"] [Date "2022.06.27"] [White "agonizing-servant"] [Black "ignorant-letter"] [Result "0-1"] [UTCDate "2022.06.27"] [UTCTime "21:10:43"] [WhiteElo "1738"] [BlackElo "1551"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-9"] [BlackRatingDiff "+29"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "15+0"] [ECO "C25"] [Opening "Vienna Game: Anderssen Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "chess.pro"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Bc5 { C25 Vienna Game: Anderssen Defense } 3. Qf3?! { (0.36 → -0.43) Inaccuracy. Nf3 was best. } (3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nxd4 Nf6 6. Bf4 Nc6 7. Nxc6 bxc6 8. Qd2 O-O 9. O-O-O Qe7) 3... d6 4. b4?? { (0.01 → -2.09) Blunder. Na4 was best. } (4. Na4) 4... Bxb4 5. Bc4 Nf6 6. Nd5 Nxd5 7. Bxd5 O-O 8. Qg3? { (-1.97 → -3.37) Mistake. c3 was best. } (8. c3 Ba5) 8... c6?! { (-3.37 → -2.40) Inaccuracy. Nd7 was best. } (8... Nd7) 9. Bc4 b5 10. Be2 Na6 11. c3 Ba5 12. Ba3 Bb6? { (-3.53 → -2.12) Mistake. Rb8 was best. } (12... Rb8 13. Rc1) 13. d4?? { (-2.12 → -4.98) Blunder. Nf3 was best. } (13. Nf3 f5 14. exf5 Bxf5 15. O-O Nc5 16. Bxc5 Bxc5 17. d4 exd4 18. Nxd4 Bd7 19. Bh5 b4) 13... f5?! { (-4.98 → -3.74) Inaccuracy. exd4 was best. } (13... exd4 14. Bxd6) 14. Qd3?! { (-3.74 → -5.77) Inaccuracy. exf5 was best. } (14. exf5 exd4 15. cxd4 Bxd4 16. Rd1 c5 17. Bc1 Bxf5 18. Nf3 Bc3+ 19. Bd2 Bxd2+ 20. Rxd2 c4) 14... fxe4 15. Qxe4 Bb7?? { (-5.82 → -2.74) Blunder. b4 was best. } (15... b4 16. Qxc6 Rb8 17. cxb4 Bxd4 18. Nf3 Bxa1 19. O-O Nxb4 20. Bxb4 Rxb4 21. Rxa1 Be6 22. Bd3) 16. Nf3 Rf4 17. Qb1 e4 18. Qb3+? { (-2.55 → -4.15) Mistake. Nd2 was best. } (18. Nd2) 18... Rf7 19. Nd2 Qe7? { (-3.23 → -1.73) Mistake. d5 was best. } (19... d5 20. O-O) 20. O-O Nc7? { (-2.05 → -0.91) Mistake. b4 was best. } (20... b4 21. cxb4 Nc7 22. Nc4 Ne6 23. Bb2 Nf4 24. Bg4 Ba6 25. g3 h5 26. Bc1 d5 27. Nxb6) 21. Bh5?? { (-0.91 → -2.71) Blunder. Rae1 was best. } (21. Rae1 c5) 21... g6 22. Rae1 c5?? { (-3.83 → -1.09) Blunder. b4 was best. } (22... b4 23. Rxe4 Qf6 24. Rg4 bxa3 25. Ne4 Qe6 26. Qxe6 Nxe6 27. Bxg6 hxg6 28. Rxg6+ Rg7 29. Rxe6) 23. dxc5 dxc5 24. Qd1?? { (-0.82 → -6.62) Blunder. Bf3 was best. } (24. Bf3 c4) 24... Rd8 25. Bf3 Rxf3 26. Qb3+?! { (-5.98 → -9.06) Inaccuracy. Qxf3 was best. } (26. Qxf3) 26... Rf7 27. Re2 a5 28. Bc1 a4 29. Qb2 Qh4 30. g3 Qg4 31. Rfe1 c4 32. Nxc4?! { (-11.50 → Mate in 10) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Re3 was best. } (32. Re3 Bxe3) 32... e3 33. Nxb6 Qe4 34. f3 Qxf3 35. Rg2 Rd2 36. Qxd2 exd2 37. Re8+ Nxe8 38. g4 d1=R# { Black wins by checkmate. } 0-1

0

0

0

000

Inaccuracies

Mistakes

Blunders

Average centipawn loss

0

0

0

000

Insights will available after game finish
Reconnecting
© ROYAL CHESS FZCO, team@chess.proContacts & Support Privacy Terms of service